EILEEN TABIOS Engages
Bombyonder by Reb
Livingston
(Bitter Cherry Books, Atlanta, GA, 2014)
I kept thinking of
chapter parataxis as I read through Bombyonder. That, alone, would make me argue this is a
poetry book versus novel. Except that
the book transparently offers a narrative frame—e.g., its first paragraph:
“Some
kind of war happened at one time or another and continued for quite some time
to come. There had to be an end to it,
sometime, but when that time would be I couldn’t say. What I could say was that historians from
another time, along with the archivists, archaeologists and scuba divers from
that same time discovered some kind of bomb, one of the kinds of bombs invented
by my father, a bomb he slowly worked on for most of his existence to ensure he
maintained an existence after he was long gone.
Once this discovery was made, my life was never recorded the same.”
I want to say: the above
excerpt (like the rest of the book) strikes me as the kind of stuff that can be
written by someone who doesn’t suffer fools well. But that’s just me having fun. What I should note is that my focus in genre stems from hearing stuff about the work's genre—what is it?—prior to its release and before I came to read it. One of the blurbers, Lindsay Hill, even says
it is “its own genre.” But actually, I
easily recognize a genre for this book.
It’s the howl.
I sense the howl because
one of the book’s biggest strengths is voice (yep, voice the old-fashioned way).
The strength of the voice is not that it’s a howl but that it stays
strong and consistent from beginning to end—indeed, it’s not just consistent
but ratchets up in intensity as one goes deeper into the book. The author was “on”—in that space of the
author being the pen rather than the one wielding the pen for words that
alchemized their own urgency for existence—as she wrote out this project—but
she was on for an entire 343 pages and that’s impressive.
Howl. Wilderness.
More actually, wild.
I’ve said elsewhere I
think the human race is manifesting suicide. This isn’t to say there’ll be a total
wipe-out of existence. But existence as
we know it is doomed and there will be a wipe-out and Bombyonder can be an example of the aftermath.
As aftermath, the immediate aftermath. There is a future beyond—in the yonder of—Bombyonder’s particular prediction. What Bombyonder
says about it is the only thing one can say honestly
(unless one wants to push one’s self forward as a prophet, seer, the Pope et al
and fortunately Reb Livingston shows no desire for such): the future’s eyes are bloodshot.
Livingston, as author,
earns the adjective “visionary” by citing the “spirals of time” related to what
happens as humanity rejiggers itself into the post of the current path which is
not sustainable. Visionary in that the
way forward is not just straight but goes back and forth: memory (not to be
confused with past), is also raw material.
The future is the future, though, precisely because it’s unknown. So I call Bombyonder
honest for not pretending to predict anything besides that its eyes are bloodshot.
Another critic could do
marvels with reviewing this book by throwing all the European philosophers at
it. I won’t go there—I will just say
that I like the book a lot for its unique depiction of what humans have called
“hell” while still offering the possibility for redemption. In this sense, the
book is both (1) experimental, and (2) not “experimental” but rather makes
old-fashioned fresh.
Maybe I was wrong in the
first paragraph. Because the prior
paragraph shows I’m reading the book as a novel—as a story—after all. I don’t think I’m revealing a spoiler to say
that Oedipus arises in the book’s last chapter.
As the canon for human knowledge, Wikipedia, notes:
“Oedipus represents … the flawed nature of humanity and an
individual's role in the course of destiny in a harsh universe.”
Or maybe I wasn’t wrong
in the first paragraph. Because Bombyonder, as story, is also about
something else besides its narrative.
Which is to say, ultimately it’s up to you what this book is and why
not?! Oedipus rises again, albeit more
muscled by experience, to remind us all that we all have agency in defining
life post bomb (with “bomb” here not just a bomb but a metaphor for all sorts
of destruction). So let’s not close
those bloodshot eyes.
Bombyonder—whatever
its genre is, it’s a book that had to be written and we’re fortunate it was
written by a poet attuned to the many marvelous possibilities of language. Let me end with this excerpt from a chapter
entitled “Introduction to Terror”—whose carefully crafted sentences show, among
other things, how philosophy need not trump the rhythm of words:
We invented forgetting millions ago because we
thought it was possible, more attainable than flying, turning invisible or
forgiving the ones who wronged us. At least we didn’t go so far as to pretend
we could heal. At least we should be credited with that.
Forgetting was not disappearing, it
was burial and after enough time passed what was buried again began to
chemically break down, parts disintegrated, what was buried changed, sometimes
melding with its surroundings, sometimes poisoning. Sometimes something new
would sprout up from it and that could very well be anything but it was always
unexpected. The more we buried, the more our forgetting accumulated, the deeper
it went, millions of years deep, perhaps more, we don’t know how many layers it
goes. If we did, we forgot. What we know now is that no matter how decayed,
there are always remnants and the remnants are never just remnants—they’re the
Styrofoam of the soul.
*****
Eileen Tabios reveals something about herself in ARDUITY'S interview about what's hard about her poetry. Her just-released poetry collection, SUN STIGMATA (Sculpture Poems), received a review by Amazon Hall of Famer reviewer Grady Harp. Due out in 2015 will be her second "Collected Poems" project; while her first THE THORN ROSARY was focused on the prose poem form, her forthcoming INVEN(S)TORY will focus on the list or catalog poem form. More information at http://eileenrtabios.com
No comments:
Post a Comment